From @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET  Tue Jan 26 19:56:57 1993
Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Tue, 26 Jan 1993 15:32:51 -0500
Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)    with BSMTP id 7822; Tue, 26 Jan 93 15:31:29 EST
Received: from CUVMB.BITNET by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP  id 1236; Tue, 26 Jan 93 15:31:30 EST
Date:         Tue, 26 Jan 1993 19:56:57 GMT
Reply-To: I.Alexander.bra0125@oasis.icl.co.uk
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU>
From: I.Alexander.bra0125@OASIS.ICL.CO.UK
Subject:      RE: Re: A small Christmas/New Year/Kwanzaa gift to the list
X-To:         cowan@snark.thyrsus.com
X-Cc:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To: Erik Rauch <erikr@MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU>
Status: RO
X-Status: 
Message-ID: <mk4I-qu6cuL.A.yOC.i70kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org>

la djan. kau,n. cusku di'e

> la nitcion. cusku di'e

> > >.i banoroi la pyf. kelci klama
> > >fo le grutrcerise klaji
> >
> > {la pyf. banoroi kelci klama}

> Ayther will do, as the Irishman said when asked whether it was better to
> say "eether" or "eyether".  "banoroi [ku]" is what's meant; the semantics
> are identical.

'Fraid not, John.  Nick's point is that the {ku} is not elidable
in this situation.  {banoroi} is a perfectly good tag for the
sumti {la pyf.}.

mi'e .i,n.