From LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU Sat Mar 6 22:59:52 2010 Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Wed, 27 Jan 1993 17:11:04 -0500 Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 4977; Wed, 27 Jan 93 17:09:43 EST Received: from CUVMB.BITNET by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 8957; Wed, 27 Jan 93 17:09:22 EST Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 15:01:48 -0500 Reply-To: John Cowan Sender: Lojban list From: John Cowan Subject: Re: GENERAL: rafsi changes are not yet in place X-To: Lojban List To: Erik Rauch In-Reply-To: <9301271548.AA02753@relay1.UU.NET> from "Logical Language Group" at Jan 27, 93 10:43:11 am Status: RO X-Status: X-From-Space-Date: Wed Jan 27 10:01:48 1993 X-From-Space-Address: @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET Message-ID: <09iBNq2EKOD.A.EQC.o70kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org> la lojbab. cusku di'e > John Cowan just posted to the extent that "sle" was the rafsi for selci and > not selfu. This is incorrect, since the rafsi changes are not in place and > published. John (and perhaps others) are occasionally guilty of forgetting > that not everyone has the latest in-development information. This change was published in JL16, p. 11, and predates the rafsi review process. I didn't realize that until I went looking back through old LogFlash gismu lists, or I would have responded differently. -- John Cowan cowan@snark.thyrsus.com ...!uunet!cbmvax!snark!cowan e'osai ko sarji la lojban.