From LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU  Sat Mar  6 22:59:52 2010
Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Fri, 22 Jan 1993 14:10:31 -0500
Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)    with BSMTP id 2314; Fri, 22 Jan 93 14:09:12 EST
Received: from CUVMB.BITNET by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP  id 3235; Fri, 22 Jan 93 14:08:49 EST
Date:         Fri, 22 Jan 1993 11:41:46 -0500
Reply-To: John Cowan <cbmvax!snark.thyrsus.com!cowan@UUNET.UU.NET>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU>
From: John Cowan <cbmvax!snark.thyrsus.com!cowan@UUNET.UU.NET>
Subject:      Re: A small Christmas/New Year/Kwanzaa gift to the list
X-To:         Lojban List <lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu>
To: Erik Rauch <erikr@MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU>
In-Reply-To:  <199301212314.AA20591@munagin.ee.mu.OZ.AU> from "Nick Nicholas"               at Jan 22, 93 10:14:17 am
Status: RO
X-Status: 
X-From-Space-Date: Fri Jan 22 06:41:46 1993
X-From-Space-Address: @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET
Message-ID: <riTnva_46XE.A.HQC.o70kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org>

la nitcion. cusku di'e

> >la pyf. poi makfa cu'urcrida
>
> I've always used {cridrdrakone}, in any case, wouldn't {respycrida} be more
> appropriate?

As you like.  In my imagination, {ka curnu} is one of the essential properties
of a dragon.

> >.i lo nobli turni cu polje
> >vo'a mu'i tu'a le litru
>
> A king folds himself for the travellers? I don't understand.

Perhaps "si'arturni" would be more like it.  "Noble kings and princes/Bowed
whene'er they came".

> >.i lo cu'urcrida roroi jmive
> >.iku'i lo nanla na go'i
>
> Ambiguity, which may or may not be worth resolving. In this context, the
> boy doesn't stop living, he stops being a boy.

This mimics the ambiguity of the original.

> >.i banoroi la pyf. kelci klama
> >fo le grutrcerise klaji
>
> {la pyf. banoroi kelci klama}

Ayther will do, as the Irishman said when asked whether it was better to
say "eether" or "eyether".  "banoroi [ku]" is what's meant; the semantics
are identical.

> >.iku'i zgana le kanla noi badri
> >.i la sofis. ba'o terpa
>
> Say whether Sophie or Puff did the seeing (I know it's obvious, but say it
> anyway).

Lojban is an ellipsis language: why say what's obvious?

--
John Cowan      cowan@snark.thyrsus.com         ...!uunet!cbmvax!snark!cowan
                        e'osai ko sarji la lojban.