From LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU Sat Mar 6 22:59:52 2010 Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Wed, 6 Jan 1993 16:55:33 -0500 Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 9150; Wed, 06 Jan 93 13:55:33 EST Received: from CUVMB.BITNET by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 6504; Wed, 06 Jan 93 13:55:17 EST Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 18:53:45 +0000 Reply-To: And Rostabably Sender: Lojban list From: And Rostabably Subject: Re: TECH: se, te, & lujvo X-To: lojban@cuvma.BITNET, Logical Language Group To: Erik Rauch In-Reply-To: (Your message of Wed, 23 Dec 92 09:44:26 EST.) <9212231444.AA15319@daily.grebyn.com> Status: O X-Status: X-From-Space-Date: Wed Jan 6 18:53:45 1993 X-From-Space-Address: @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET Message-ID: <2LHG9BncRWE.A.KQC.o70kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org> > "se" of course doesn't necessarily mean that you ARE doing such a diddling, > though a lujvo "sel-" might allow it in a limited sense. An x1 equivalent > would have no meaning OTHER than that you were diddling, because CVCjerna > would NEVER mean the same as jerna, since you would use the shorter word > if you could. In _seljerna_, which can be broken down into se+l+jerna, the l indicates diddling. Why use it, except to diddle? Perhaps, then, _(y)ljerna_ yields a diddled lujvoid with the same x1 as jerna. ---- And.