From @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET Thu Apr 1 19:18:09 1993 Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Wed, 31 Mar 1993 18:20:34 -0500 Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 1611; Wed, 31 Mar 93 18:19:13 EST Received: from CUVMB.BITNET by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 1539; Wed, 31 Mar 93 18:20:29 EST Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1993 09:18:09 +1000 Reply-To: Nick Nicholas Sender: Lojban list From: Nick Nicholas Subject: Further Lojban->Prolog: relative clauses (Repost) X-To: Lojban Mailing List To: Erik Rauch Status: OR Message-ID: At the moment, if {ke'a} isn't there, it isn't assumed; it's pretty certain that, if I don't find ke'a there, I'll shove it into the first free place in the relative clause predication. I've gotten numbers working too, but that's not that spectacular. I'm about to implement the lo/le distinction (well, next week: done enough for this), and would welcome any opinions. --- mi prami le prenu ku poi ke'a citka le cakla *** brivla prami brivla prenu brivla citka brivla cakla end_of_lex_list mi prami le prenu ku poi keha citka le cakla ku vau kuho vau *** [q(suho(1), _FIODG, prenu(_FIODG, _FIPZL, _FIPZM, _FIPZN, _FIPZO), q(suho(1), _FIRXG, cakla(_FIRXG, _FITTL, _FITTM, _FITTN, _FITTO), [], citka(_FIODG, _FIRXG, _FIRXH, _FIRXI, _FIRXJ)), prami(mi, _FIODG, _FIODH, _FIODI, _FIODJ))] Translation: E X: prenu(X); (E Y: cakla(Y); [] (citka(X,Y)) (prami(mi,X)) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Nick S. Nicholas, "Rode like foam on the river of pity CogSci & CompSci student, Turned its tide to strength University of Melbourne, Australia. Healed the hole that ripped in living" nsn@{munagin.ee|mundil.cs}.mu.oz.au - Suzanne Vega, Book Of Dreams ______________________________________________________________________________