From @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET  Wed Mar 24 11:06:08 1993
Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Wed, 24 Mar 1993 16:08:18 -0500
Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)    with BSMTP id 4790; Wed, 24 Mar 93 16:06:59 EST
Received: from CUVMB.BITNET by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP  id 3616; Wed, 24 Mar 93 16:08:02 EST
Date:         Wed, 24 Mar 1993 16:06:08 -0500
Reply-To: "Mark E. Shoulson" <shoulson@CTR.COLUMBIA.EDU>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU>
From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <shoulson@CTR.COLUMBIA.EDU>
Subject:      Le'avla for Wales (Pro-sumti / Pro-bridi paper)
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To: Erik Rauch <erikr@MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU>
Message-ID: <hiHC-ktXXwI.A._-.T30kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org>

>Date:         Tue, 23 Mar 1993 18:44:06 GMT
>From: A.D.M.Smith%BRADFORD.AC.UK@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU

>Can't you use "gugdrkmri" as a le'avla for Wales, or is
>a vocalic 'm' not permitted?

You can, and I think that's what was done in the case a while back.  But
since the vowel realy is a schwa, and you can't have "y" in le'avla, I
didn't like it as much as "gugdrkimri".  My own opinion, of course.

~mark