From LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU Sat Mar 6 22:55:29 2010 Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Fri, 12 Mar 1993 12:35:57 -0500 Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 7727; Fri, 12 Mar 93 12:34:51 EST Received: from CUVMB.BITNET by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 2834; Fri, 12 Mar 93 12:35:49 EST Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1993 11:58:49 -0500 Reply-To: John Cowan Sender: Lojban list From: John Cowan Subject: TECH: Proposed new rafsi for NU cmavo X-To: Lojban List To: Erik Rauch Status: OR X-From-Space-Date: Fri Mar 12 06:58:49 1993 X-From-Space-Address: @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET Message-ID: Nick Nicholas has proposed that all the abstractors of selma'o NU receive rafsi. Currently, only some NUs have rafsi: the others have conventional equivalents based on the gismu from which the NU was etymologically derived. The etymological link can be less than vivid: it is meant as a memory hook, not as any kind of equivalent (unlike the BAI situation). Here is a table of NU cmavo, the related gismu, the proposed rafsi, and a change note. This list constitutes newly created proposals 223-229 of the rafsi review. Please comment ASAP. nu fasnu nun no change ka ckaji kam #34; was kaz ni klani nil #36; was niz jei jetnu jez no change li'i lifri liz #223; was "lifrysucty" si'o sidbo siz #224; was "sidbysucty" su'u sucta sus #225; was "sucty" du'u ----- dum introduced pre-review pu'u pruce pup #226; was "prucynun" za'i zasti zam #227; was "zastynun" zu'o zukte zum #228; was "zuktynun" mu'e mulno mub #229; was "mulnynun" Note: All of these rafsi are currently free (as of the changes made by the review), so no gismu or other cmavo are being "booted out". -- John Cowan cowan@snark.thyrsus.com ...!uunet!lock60!snark!cowan e'osai ko sarji la lojban.