From @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET Sat Mar 27 11:04:27 1993 Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Fri, 26 Mar 1993 10:06:41 -0500 Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 5313; Fri, 26 Mar 93 10:05:25 EST Received: from CUVMB.BITNET by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 6576; Fri, 26 Mar 93 10:05:40 EST Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1993 01:04:27 +1000 Reply-To: Nick Nicholas Sender: Lojban list From: Nick Nicholas Subject: Re: TECH: grammar updates X-To: cowan@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM X-Cc: Lojban Mailing List To: Erik Rauch In-Reply-To: from "John Cowan" at Mar 25, 93 02:23:20 pm Message-ID: John Cowan stood up, stood up some more, and spoke thus: >Well, I have now decided to withdraw my support for the "*mo'u" construction. >The formal change is being kept in until a few off-list people (Nora and >possibly pc) have a chance to review it, but I personally have accepted >Colin's arguments, and added one of my own. Um... this turn of events sounds suspiciously like we're jettisoning the usual uses of {mau} altogether, in favour of the more 'logical' form, with {zmadu} as selbri. In fact, this leaves us with little need for {mau} at all. I hope you all are aware of this... (debate welcomed, but i'll have little time to participate in it... though I *have* successfully implemented tanru-unit-2 -> SE ... BRIVLA, and I allow cmene and brivla to be passed onto Prolog from yacc directly, without needing to be predefined within Prolog.) (In other news, in my Discource Analysis course, the only part of my course I'm currently enjoying, we've just done conversational implicature. I thought of how lojban handles it, and smiled :) >The Nick/Lojbab experimental cmavo "xo'e", which eradicates a place >(so that "da klama xo'e xo'e de di" means the same as "da litru de di"), >has been assigned the cmavo "ne'e" and placed in selma'o KOhA. I don't remember well the discussions in October in which xo'e was invented by Lojbab, but I do know that Lojbab regarded it with much suspicion, and while I've used it in my lujvo paper to explain the selpinxe <> se pinxe debate, I did not agree with Lojbab in considering its paedagogical use reason enough to assign it a real cmavo. But so be it. You won't see me complaining about the declefter being included in the grammar :) , but I must congratulate John on picking a particularly elegant resolution to the issue. In fact, congrats to John for consistently dealing with grammatical issues so elegantly. One question though: your use of ZEI has: tanru_unit_2 -> anyword (ZEI anyword) ... I would have though something like tanru_unit_2 -> anyword [(ZEI anyword) ...] ZEI tanru_unit_2 to be more sensible: I find it hard to think of a place structure for {xy zei zy}. Momenton senpretende paseman mi retenis kaj # [Victor Sadler, _Memkritiko_ 90] kultis kvazaux & (NICK NICHOLAS. Melbourne. senhorlogxan elizeon # Australia. IRC: nicxjo. (Dume: & nsn@munagin.ee.mu.oz.au .)