From LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU Sat Mar 6 22:52:31 2010 Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Mon, 26 Apr 1993 11:18:48 -0400 Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 3777; Mon, 26 Apr 93 11:18:19 EDT Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 4926; Mon, 26 Apr 93 11:18:41 EST Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1993 10:09:59 -0400 Reply-To: John Cowan Sender: Lojban list From: John Cowan Subject: Re: Navaho (was: version declaration for le lojbau) X-To: Lojban List To: Erik Rauch In-Reply-To: <9304230458.AA07038@relay1.UU.NET> from "Logical Language Group" at Apr 23, 93 00:39:20 am X-From-Space-Date: Mon Apr 26 06:09:59 1993 X-From-Space-Address: @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET Message-ID: la lojbab. cusku di'e > I'm not sure that Colin's pseudo-lujvo of name-zei-brivla meet the morpholog- > gical rules of the language, even if they are grammatically OK. Names not > marked preceding with "la" or "doi" or grammatically where 'any-word' is allowed > as in 'zoi' quotes and la'o names, are theoretical subject to being absorbed > into a preceding word (or absorbuing a preceding word). They must be preceded by pause, that's all: ".navaxos. zei bangu" is fine. I agree that this is kind of pointless compared to the le'avla "bangrnavaxo" or whatever. > Still, we allow name+bu, so I guess the morphology processor should accept > name+zei+brivla. Yes. It's probably important to note that things like "bet.bu" are really ".bet.bu", and I will revise the draft lerfu paper accordingly. -- John Cowan cowan@snark.thyrsus.com ...!uunet!lock60!snark!cowan e'osai ko sarji la lojban.