From LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU Sat Mar 6 22:51:46 2010 Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Tue, 25 May 1993 11:31:27 -0400 Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 2652; Tue, 25 May 93 11:29:17 EDT Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 0702; Tue, 25 May 93 11:27:31 EDT Date: Tue, 25 May 1993 10:30:02 -0400 Reply-To: John Cowan Sender: Lojban list From: John Cowan Subject: Re: TECH: more on morphology problem - some opionions X-To: Lojban List To: Erik Rauch In-Reply-To: <9305251227.AA13236@relay1.UU.NET> from "Iain Alexander" at May 25, 93 01:25:29 pm Status: O X-Status: X-From-Space-Date: Tue May 25 06:30:02 1993 X-From-Space-Address: @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET Message-ID: Iain Alexander quotes me: > > Names are still just ...C, with no impermissible medial consonant > > pairs. and apparently reads this as meaning that no medial consonant pairs are impermissible. What I meant was that medial consonant pairs which are impermissible (by the usual rules) are not allowed in names either. Thus "*djeimz" = James and "*bradfrd" = Bradford are forbidden. This is a fairly new restriction. -- John Cowan cowan@snark.thyrsus.com ...!uunet!lock60!snark!cowan e'osai ko sarji la lojban.