From LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU Sat Mar 6 22:51:54 2010 Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Sun, 30 May 1993 21:47:18 -0400 Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 6873; Sun, 30 May 93 21:46:24 EDT Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 4983; Sun, 30 May 93 21:47:39 EDT Date: Sun, 30 May 1993 21:45:11 EDT Reply-To: Logical Language Group Sender: Lojban list From: Logical Language Group Subject: response to one note by Frank Schulz - tanru place structures X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Erik Rauch Status: RO X-Status: X-From-Space-Date: Sun May 30 17:45:11 1993 X-From-Space-Address: @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET Message-ID: Frank says that tanru obscure place structures. I am not sure what he means, but they shouldn't. The place structure of ALL tanru are the place structure of the final term. Thus, the place structure of nenri klama is that of klama. Any places that relate to nenri, must be attached directly to nenri with be/bei/be'o. lujvo may have somewhat obscure place structures until established through usage (or dictionary), but not tanru. lojbab