From @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET Tue Jun 1 07:41:44 1993 Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Tue, 1 Jun 1993 18:21:26 -0400 Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 4027; Tue, 01 Jun 93 18:20:32 EDT Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 6032; Tue, 01 Jun 93 18:21:51 EDT Date: Tue, 1 Jun 1993 14:41:44 PDT Reply-To: fschulz@pyramid.com Sender: Lojban list From: fschulz@PYRAMID.COM Subject: tanru place structure X-To: lojban list To: Erik Rauch Status: RO X-Status: Message-ID: la lojbab cusku di'e > Frank says that tanru obscure place structures. I am not sure what he > means, but they shouldn't. > > The place structure of ALL tanru are the place structure of the final > term. Thus, the place structure of nenri klama is that of klama. Any places > that relate to nenri, must be attached directly to nenri with be/bei/be'o. Error on my part. I looked at the Lojban grammar summary which I read several times and found this stated. I can even remember reading that paragraph. I may be confusing this with older loglan versions. I read parts of an old JCB book. -- Frank Schulz ( fschulz@pyramid.com )