From @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET Tue Jun 1 20:37:33 1993 Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Wed, 2 Jun 1993 00:45:44 -0400 Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 5063; Wed, 02 Jun 93 00:44:50 EDT Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 7807; Wed, 02 Jun 93 00:46:09 EDT Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1993 00:37:33 EDT Reply-To: Logical Language Group Sender: Lojban list From: Logical Language Group Subject: rafsi baseline and pe'a X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Erik Rauch Status: O X-Status: Message-ID: Well, Nick got in with a comment in time %^) Of course he said something halfway between what Cowan and I said. If I understand correctly, he is agreeing to what I said for po'a, but asking that it be the assigned defintion of pe'a rather than po'a, and that the current meaning assigned to pe'a be deleted (though it would be the WORD po'a that would go away). This is fine by me, though I would feel queasy about using a UI on the left end of a tanru or lujvo, and people seem to want to flag figurative usages in forethought. For the baseline, I will make the rafsi assignment pev to pe'a, leave open the question of whether po'a gets a rafsi - it would be an open question in the baseline, but one which we've left a reserved spot for, until this discussion woorks through. I will prepare the files, and either send them to Lojban list or to PLS (or both, as appropriate) depending on the size. I will also be sending an updated cmavo and gismu list to the PLS when I send rafsi lists, but that makes for several big files, and Mark S. has been lying low of late, so I won't presumet that teh PLS will have the files immediately. Thus, if I can post some form of the list within a reasonable message length, I will do so. Watch this space for more, within a day. lojbab