From @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET  Mon Jun 21 06:08:26 1993
Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Mon, 21 Jun 1993 16:55:18 -0400
Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)    with BSMTP id 0846; Mon, 21 Jun 93 16:54:01 EDT
Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with  BSMTP id 7241; Mon, 21 Jun 93 16:54:23 EST
Date:         Mon, 21 Jun 1993 10:08:26 -0400
Reply-To: John Cowan <cowan@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU>
From: John Cowan <cowan@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>
Subject:      Re: TECH.QUERY *mexco
X-To:         Lojban List <lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu>
To: Erik Rauch <erikr@MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU>
In-Reply-To:  <9306190252.AA07965@relay1.UU.NET> from "Logical Language Group"               at Jun 18, 93 10:50:39 pm
X-Status: 
Status: OR
Message-ID: <J072CQuYVNG.A.RKE.Ut0kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org>

la lojbab. cusku di'e

> I can live with mexno as well, and the clue Colin suggested (Mexicano) is
 worth
> something.  I can suggest two other several possibilities, one of which
> support Veijo's suggestion:

I like "mexno" better than either "mexto" or "mexlo", but I think an
immediate resolution is more important than a "correct" one.

--
John Cowan      cowan@snark.thyrsus.com         ...!uunet!lock60!snark!cowan
                        e'osai ko sarji la lojban.