From LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu Sat Mar 6 22:44:38 2010 Received: from uga.cc.uga.edu ([128.192.1.5]) by mullian.ee.mu.OZ.AU (4.1) id AA04849; Tue, 8 Jun 93 07:25:54 EST Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU by uga.cc.uga.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 1888; Mon, 07 Jun 93 17:26:31 EDT Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@UGA) by UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 3319; Mon, 7 Jun 1993 17:26:31 -0400 Date: Mon, 7 Jun 1993 14:34:28 -0400 Reply-To: John Cowan Sender: Lojban list From: John Cowan Subject: Re: BTW lujvo wanted X-To: Lojban List To: Nick Nicholas In-Reply-To: <9306022107.AA02612@relay1.UU.NET> from "Logical Language Group" at Jun 2, 93 05:04:38 pm X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 Content-Length: 525 Lines: 13 Message-ID: <6Q6tLG_5dsI.A.kNE.Wt0kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org> la lojbab. cusku di'e > At any rate - can the community - in a good hurry - come up with some good > lujvo for "underwear", and for the common individual items that comprise > same (at least the children's varieties). Well, the 18th century English metaphor was {cmalu taxfu}, or sometimes {na'e ve skicu taxfu} "unmentionables", although the latter is too malglico. I kinda like {cmatau}. -- John Cowan cowan@snark.thyrsus.com ...!uunet!lock60!snark!cowan e'osai ko sarji la lojban.