From LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU Sat Mar 6 22:52:51 2010 Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Wed, 28 Jul 1993 15:30:54 -0400 Received: from YALEVM.CIS.YALE.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 4441; Wed, 28 Jul 93 15:29:42 EDT Received: from YALEVM.CIS.YALE.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@YALEVM) by YALEVM.CIS.YALE.EDU (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 2587; Wed, 28 Jul 1993 15:29:41 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1993 10:52:22 EDT Reply-To: John Cowan Sender: Lojban list From: John Cowan Subject: Re: response to jimc on -mei X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Erik Rauch In-Reply-To: <9307262323.AA08105@relay1.UU.NET>; from "Chris Handley" at Jul 27, 93 11:25 am Status: RO X-Status: X-From-Space-Date: Ukn Jul 28 15:30:55 1993 X-From-Space-Address: snark!cowan@GVLS1.VFL.PARAMAX.COM Message-ID: la .kris. xandlis. cusku di'e > Had a sudden thought. If all fractions are (ipso facto) base 10, how do we > easily talk about 1/3, 1/7 and the rest. Even the others (1/2 etc) would > change if someone habitually thought in a different base (I can certainly > make a good case for .1 being a half, a less good case for .8 and a > plausible one for .6). You can set the base explicitly using the operator "ju'u": vei pibi ju'u paxa [ve'o] prenu ( .8 base 16 ) persons You can express rational numbers with the fraction-bar cmavo "fi'u", which is a digit (not an operator): fi'uci prenu /3 persons where the numerator defaults to 1. -- John Cowan cowan@snark.thyrsus.com ...!uunet!lock60!snark!cowan e'osai ko sarji la lojban.