Received: from list.Stanford.EDU by MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Fri, 30 Jul 1993 12:56:16 -0400
Received: from Sunburn.Stanford.EDU by list.Stanford.EDU (5.65/inc-1.0)
	id AA08167; Fri, 30 Jul 93 08:37:17 -0700
Received: from seattle.amath.washington.edu by Sunburn.Stanford.EDU with SMTP (5.61+IDA/25-SUNBURN-eef) id AA18293; Fri, 30 Jul 93 08:36:11 -0700
Received: by seattle.amath.washington.edu(5.65/UW-NDC Revision: 2.21 ) id AA03042; Fri, 30 Jul 1993 08:36:08 -0700
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1993 08:29:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jim Flanagan <flanagan@amath.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: Exons and Introns.
To: genetic-programming@cs.stanford.edu
In-Reply-To: <9307300304.AA28798@netcom4.netcom.com>
Message-Id: <Pine.3.05.9307300815.D2878-9100000@seattle.amath.washington.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Status: RO
X-Status: 
X-From-Space-Date: Ukn Jul 30 12:56:17 1993
X-From-Space-Address: flanagan@amath.washington.edu

On Thu, 29 Jul 1993, David Ornstein wrote:

      >	biological nonotechnology + ga/gp = uh oh

  Is "nonotechnology" merely a splendid misnomer/slip-o-the-digits or is
  this a field I hadn't heard about?

  Anyways, What's the difference between biological nanotechnology + ga/gp
  and me? I suspect the difference is the "technology".

  Molecular Darwinism (so called) is already being used to produce useful (?)
  compunds.

  --Jim