From @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET Tue Aug 17 11:29:20 1993 Received: from ELI.CS.YALE.EDU by NEBULA.SYSTEMSZ.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 1993 05:32:30 -0400 Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by eli.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 1993 05:32:27 -0400 Message-Id: <199308170932.AA00195@eli.CS.YALE.EDU> Received: from YALEVM.CIS.YALE.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 2883; Tue, 17 Aug 93 05:30:28 EDT Received: from YALEVM.CIS.YALE.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@YALEVM) by YALEVM.CIS.YALE.EDU (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 9586; Tue, 17 Aug 1993 05:30:28 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 10:29:20 +0100 Reply-To: Colin Fine Sender: Lojban list From: Colin Fine Subject: Re: cmevla (Was: TEXT: Imagist) To: Erik Rauch Status: O X-Status: And: ++++++> What I meant is a name for the name that follows "la". A cmevla is a thing that must end with a consonant & a pause, & I presume cmetergeha to cover laho names as well. Would "zo la zei cmene" work? >++++++ It might, but I don't think it would be precise enough. How about 'cmeselgadri'? (I'm not certain whether 'selgadri' refers to the whole description including the gadri, or just the 'contents' of the description. This rather assumes the latter, but unfortunately I think the definition means the former. We need a way to refer to the latter. In fact I think we would do better with places for the thing labelled and the resulting description, rather than the sentence. Colin