From ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK  Mon Aug  2 17:29:13 1993
Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Mon, 2 Aug 1993 17:29:12 -0400
Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 3562; Mon, 02 Aug 93 17:28:05 EDT
Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with
 BSMTP id 6928; Mon, 02 Aug 93 17:29:31 EDT
Date:         Mon, 2 Aug 1993 22:28:03 +0100
Reply-To: ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU>
From: Mr Andrew Rosta <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Subject:      TECH: query re. selcmavo NU
X-To:         lojban@cuvma.BITNET
To: Erik Rauch <erikr@MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU>
Status: RO
X-Status: 
Message-ID: <DlpQGDDNtjK.A.8TH.Hy0kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org>

If I say:

    lenu mi prenu

I am referring to the event of my being a person, and if I say

    leka mi prenu

I am referring to my personhood. So, if I say

   mi prenu

this is presumably ambiguous as to whether I am referring to
the event of my being a person or to my personhood.

So, can I say, in order to disambiguate, something like:

   mi nu prenu  "there exists the event of my being a person"
   mi ka prenu  "there exists my personhood"

?
-------
cohomihelahocoho. And coho. coho