Received: from ELI.CS.YALE.EDU by NEBULA.SYSTEMSZ.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Fri, 27 Aug 1993 14:26:35 -0400 Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by eli.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Fri, 27 Aug 1993 14:26:30 -0400 Message-Id: <199308271826.AA17957@eli.CS.YALE.EDU> Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 8883; Fri, 27 Aug 93 14:24:59 EDT Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 0331; Fri, 27 Aug 93 14:27:19 EDT Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1993 11:33:26 -0400 Reply-To: John Cowan Sender: Lojban list From: John Cowan Subject: Re: TECH: QUERY on ZI & ZEhA X-To: Lojban List To: Erik Rauch In-Reply-To: <9308271258.AA16408@minerva.phyast.pitt.edu> from "Jorge LLambias" at Aug 27, 93 08:58:31 am Status: O X-Status: X-From-Space-Date: Fri Aug 27 07:33:26 1993 X-From-Space-Address: @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET la xorxes. cusku di'e > I think: > zo'e broda ZAhO le nu brode = ca le nu brode ku zo'e ZAhO broda The trouble with this equivalence is that "ca" is aorist, so doesn't get the right effect. If we say that one event is simultaneous with the aftermath of another, we do >not< exclude that they might overlap, because the first event might have started before the second event ended. To solve this problem, we must change your "ca" to "ca'o" which is obviously circular. Sumti tcita ZAhO is truly sui generis. (3 langs, 1 sentence!) -- John Cowan cowan@snark.thyrsus.com ...!uunet!lock60!snark!cowan e'osai ko sarji la lojban.