Received: from ELI.CS.YALE.EDU by NEBULA.SYSTEMSZ.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Wed, 25 Aug 1993 17:55:42 -0400 Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by eli.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Wed, 25 Aug 1993 17:55:38 -0400 Message-Id: <199308252155.AA01119@eli.CS.YALE.EDU> Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 9232; Wed, 25 Aug 93 17:54:13 EDT Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 6284; Wed, 25 Aug 93 17:56:25 EDT Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1993 17:30:39 -0400 Reply-To: John Cowan Sender: Lojban list From: John Cowan Subject: Re: TECH: QUERY: quantifier scope & cumki X-To: Lojban List To: Erik Rauch In-Reply-To: <9308252021.AA07565@relay1.UU.NET> from "Mr Andrew Rosta" at Aug 25, 93 09:18:54 pm Status: O X-Status: X-From-Space-Date: Wed Aug 25 13:30:39 1993 X-From-Space-Address: @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET la .and. cusku di'e > > The American philosopher W.V.O. Quine, an early > > supporter of the Loglan Project. > > Is this true? What form did his support take? How come undergrads don't > do Loglan in their intro logic courses then? Early supporters don't necessarily remain so. Actually, I have no idea what Quine thinks now. (When we have some books, maybe we should send him copies -- if he is still alive!) But the back edition of JCB's >Loglan 1<, 4th ed (1989), says: > Reactions to the Third (1975) Edition: > > I am impressed with Loglan. Linguistically, logically, and philosophi- > cally it is very sophisticated. Its most conspicuous feature, and a > laudable one, is the primacy accorded to the category of predicates. > No copula remains [no longer true, but we don't use it much], > nor any distinction between verb, adjective, and > common noun. This line is ... strongly indicated by modern logic, but > hitherto neglected by the International Auxiliary Language frater- > nity. > Prof. W.V.O. Quine > Philosophy, Harvard University -- John Cowan cowan@snark.thyrsus.com ...!uunet!lock60!snark!cowan e'osai ko sarji la lojban.