Received: from ELI.CS.YALE.EDU by NEBULA.SYSTEMSZ.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Mon, 16 Aug 1993 13:49:34 -0400 Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by eli.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Mon, 16 Aug 1993 13:49:26 -0400 Message-Id: <199308161749.AA14001@eli.CS.YALE.EDU> Received: from YALEVM.CIS.YALE.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 9891; Mon, 16 Aug 93 13:48:06 EDT Received: from YALEVM.CIS.YALE.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@YALEVM) by YALEVM.CIS.YALE.EDU (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 6644; Mon, 16 Aug 1993 13:46:19 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1993 11:12:48 -0400 Reply-To: John Cowan Sender: Lojban list From: John Cowan Subject: Re: La Cucaracha (was Re: Quine on perfectives) X-To: Lojban List To: Erik Rauch In-Reply-To: <9308131927.AA08653@relay1.UU.NET> from "Jorge LLambias" at Aug 13, 93 03:25:36 pm Status: O X-Status: X-From-Space-Date: Mon Aug 16 07:12:48 1993 X-From-Space-Address: @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET la xorxes. cusku di'e > John, you said nothing of my choice of {pu'i} over {ka'e} or {nu'o}. I'm not equipped to judge, since the choice reflects a subtlety of the orginal ("ya no" as an idiom) that I'm not equipped to evaluate. > I'm not sure what {na'e pu'i} means: demonstrated inability? It is vague: something other than (demonstrated ability). Context has to tell what, as with all uses of "na'e". > > I have corrected one obsolete rafsi and > > one obsolete cmavo. [bogus version deleted] > (I think cirni should be cipni) Right! It never occurred to me to check for obsolete gismu. At that early stage, the gismu list was not yet baselined, and some entries had not yet reached their final form. "cirni" became "cipni" in order to provide a better rafsi assignment. For the archives, the final form is: .i pa blabi papcipni .i mi cipni vi le tsani .i pa blabi papcipni .i ga'u lei cmana mi vofli .i noda le'arkakne le ka zifre po mi -- John Cowan cowan@snark.thyrsus.com ...!uunet!lock60!snark!cowan e'osai ko sarji la lojban.