Received: from ELI.CS.YALE.EDU by NEBULA.SYSTEMSZ.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Mon, 16 Aug 1993 13:52:29 -0400 Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by eli.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Mon, 16 Aug 1993 13:52:23 -0400 Message-Id: <199308161752.AA14046@eli.CS.YALE.EDU> Received: from YALEVM.CIS.YALE.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 9898; Mon, 16 Aug 93 13:51:03 EDT Received: from YALEVM.CIS.YALE.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@YALEVM) by YALEVM.CIS.YALE.EDU (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 6663; Mon, 16 Aug 1993 13:46:38 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1993 12:03:26 -0400 Reply-To: John Cowan Sender: Lojban list From: John Cowan Subject: Re: TEXT: xislu mu'ucutci (roller skating) X-To: Lojban List To: Erik Rauch In-Reply-To: <9308161350.AA07221@relay1.UU.NET> from "Jorge LLambias" at Aug 16, 93 09:45:54 am Status: O X-Status: X-From-Space-Date: Mon Aug 16 08:03:26 1993 X-From-Space-Address: @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET la xorxes. cusku di'e > Is xem the rafsi for xe? It says xel on my list. Now I see why I didn't > understand jboxemrmri. The rafsi for "xe" was "xem-" prior to baselining. Oddly, this one got changed not by any reasoned argument but by the sustained weight of error. The analogy of "sel-" and "vel-" caused both me and Nick to use "xel-" erroneously, and my use got published in "Imaginary Journeys". lojbab reluctantly capitulated, but doesn't always remember. -- John Cowan cowan@snark.thyrsus.com ...!uunet!lock60!snark!cowan e'osai ko sarji la lojban.