From LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU Sat Mar 6 22:49:55 2010 Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Tue, 3 Aug 1993 20:03:39 -0400 Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 9243; Tue, 03 Aug 93 20:02:32 EDT Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 8770; Tue, 03 Aug 93 20:04:02 EDT Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1993 01:00:36 +0100 Reply-To: ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK Sender: Lojban list From: Mr Andrew Rosta Subject: Re: TECH: anniversary X-To: lojban@cuvma.BITNET, Nick Nicholas To: Erik Rauch In-Reply-To: (Your message of Mon, 02 Aug 93 19:13:51 W.) <9308021028.AA56008@link-1.ts.bcc.ac.uk> Status: RO X-Status: X-From-Space-Date: Ukn Aug 3 20:03:40 1993 X-From-Space-Address: ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK Message-ID: Nick says: > I'm going through new lujvo these days, and have foundered on the concept of > anniversary. I'm not happy with And's {kratentei}, and I suggest, for > comment: > tembavtei: t1(1)=t2(3) t1(2) t1(3) b2 t(2)2. We now have citsi, so I won't comment further on your suggestions, but I do note that one reason to be unhappy with "kratentei" is that it was intened to be krasi zei te temci, in which case it ought to be "kratertei". I had thought (- well I didn't think - I jumped unthinkingly to a conclusion) that one just glued on the SE cmavo using any of the available glue (hyphen) consonants & hadn't realized they had their own rafsi. There is, incidentally, a staggering difference between the gismu list recently advertised as being on the PLS and the list I'd been using (dated Jan 1989). I urge anyone who hasn't, to update their gismu lists. Also, my list says the rafsi have been baselined, which is news to me. I'd thought that suggestions for reassignment of rafsi were still legit, but apparently not. ----- And