From LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU  Sat Mar  6 22:50:01 2010
Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Tue, 3 Aug 1993 13:17:29 -0400
Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 7019; Tue, 03 Aug 93 13:14:47 EDT
Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with
 BSMTP id 4512; Tue, 03 Aug 93 13:16:24 EDT
Date:         Tue, 3 Aug 1993 18:15:03 +0100
Reply-To: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU>
From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
Subject:      Re: [long] Re:  On the tense system
To: Erik Rauch <erikr@MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU>
Status: RO
X-Status: 
X-From-Space-Date: Ukn Aug  3 13:17:30 1993
X-From-Space-Address: C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK
Message-ID: <k1U6OtwjS4B.A.7YH.Zy0kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org>

I hadn't really thought before of the idea that ba'o and pu'o were
the wrong way round (I agree now that they are) but I had
noticed that
pu'o
and
pu'i

were in a loose sense opposite.

(pu'i is in CAhA and means 'can and has' - ie a past event)

Colin