From lojbab@GREBYN.COM  Ukn Aug  2 20:16:53 1993
Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Mon, 2 Aug 1993 20:16:52 -0400
Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 4167; Mon, 02 Aug 93 20:15:46 EDT
Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with
 BSMTP id 8725; Mon, 02 Aug 93 20:17:18 EDT
Date:         Mon, 2 Aug 1993 20:15:58 EDT
Reply-To: Logical Language Group <lojbab@GREBYN.COM>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU>
From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@GREBYN.COM>
Subject:      Re: On the tense system
X-To:         jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
X-Cc:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To: Erik Rauch <erikr@MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU>
Status: RO
X-Status: 
Message-ID: <mSsHgd5EwCP.A.GgH.vy0kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org>

You are correct on the referenc eof "pu" and "pu'o", but when we were coming
up with the ZAhO words, the focus was on "before" and "after" since we were
not using the Imaginary Journey's metaphor.  "pu and "pu'o" derive from
purci, ca and ca'o from cabna, ba and ba'o from balvi.

lojbab