From @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET  Mon Sep  6 07:53:26 1993
Received: from ELI.CS.YALE.EDU by NEBULA.SYSTEMSZ.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Mon, 6 Sep 1993 11:55:38 -0400
Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by eli.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Mon, 6 Sep 1993 11:55:34 -0400
Message-Id: <199309061555.AA06174@eli.CS.YALE.EDU>
Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)    with BSMTP id 7374; Mon, 06 Sep 93 11:54:00 EDT
Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with  BSMTP id 6843; Mon, 06 Sep 93 11:56:56 EDT
Date:         Mon, 6 Sep 1993 11:53:26 EDT
Reply-To: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU>
From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
Subject:      Re: In-laws
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To: Erik Rauch <rauch>
Status: RO
X-Status: 

la nitcion cusku di'e

> This would correspond to the English "in-laws", and
> would be translated as {spelazmi'u}.
>

I suppose that whether you use {spelazmi'u} or {spelazyki'i} depends
on how much you like your in-laws.

co'o mi'e xorxes