Received: from ELI.CS.YALE.EDU by NEBULA.SYSTEMSZ.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Tue, 28 Sep 1993 12:11:02 -0400 Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by eli.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Tue, 28 Sep 1993 12:10:56 -0400 Message-Id: <199309281610.AA06809@eli.CS.YALE.EDU> Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 8600; Tue, 28 Sep 93 12:09:09 EDT Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 9229; Tue, 28 Sep 93 12:09:29 EDT Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1993 17:05:30 +0100 Reply-To: Colin Fine Sender: Lojban list From: Colin Fine Subject: Re: TECH: a very few lujvo To: Erik Rauch Status: RO X-Status: X-From-Space-Date: Tue Sep 28 18:05:30 1993 X-From-Space-Address: @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET Nick answers: +++++++> #ta'o, zoi ly. lad ly. cu rafsi zo ladru .e nai zo cladu .i di'u se sarcu #le nu pilno zo zoi ki'u le nu zoi ly. lad ly. valsi fi no la lojban kei vau .ue # .oi Your use of the comma is quite neat, although its already being used will preclude it from being taken up thus. I think you meant to say {fi noda pe la lojban}, or {fi no da la lojban.} The comma was an accident - I don't approve of such in Lojban. I meant to say what I did say - "lad" is a word in (language) no Lojbans - unless I am out of date with my tergismu? Colin