Received: from ELI.CS.YALE.EDU by NEBULA.SYSTEMSZ.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Mon, 6 Sep 1993 11:11:10 -0400
Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by eli.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Mon, 6 Sep 1993 11:11:06 -0400
Message-Id: <199309061511.AA05633@eli.CS.YALE.EDU>
Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)    with BSMTP id 7233; Mon, 06 Sep 93 11:09:32 EDT
Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with  BSMTP id 6647; Mon, 06 Sep 93 11:12:26 EDT
Date:         Mon, 6 Sep 1993 16:07:12 +0100
Reply-To: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU>
From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
Subject:      Re: In-laws
To: Erik Rauch <rauch>
Status: RO
X-Status: 
X-From-Space-Date: Mon Sep  6 17:07:12 1993
X-From-Space-Address: @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET

In a good posting about in-laws, Jorge misses a couple of things:

> lazki'i  c1 c2 (c3=l):  x1 is related to x2 by family relationship

lazyki'i

+++++>
 Other interesting combinations are, for example, of type:

tixmamta         m1=t2 m2=t1   x1 is a mother of daughter x2

I don't know whether any natural language has different words for
mother-of-daughter, mother-of-son, etc.
>++++++
I prefer selti'u

        COLIN