Received: from ELI.CS.YALE.EDU by NEBULA.SYSTEMSZ.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Wed, 8 Sep 1993 10:43:09 -0400
Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by eli.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Wed, 8 Sep 1993 10:43:02 -0400
Message-Id: <199309081443.AA05409@eli.CS.YALE.EDU>
Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)    with BSMTP id 6979; Wed, 08 Sep 93 10:41:22 EDT
Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with  BSMTP id 1404; Wed, 08 Sep 93 10:43:49 EDT
Date:         Wed, 8 Sep 1993 15:40:25 +0100
Reply-To: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU>
From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Subject:      Re: Greek and Latin name list
X-To:         lojban@cuvma.BITNET
To: Erik Rauch <rauch>
In-Reply-To:  (Your message of Wed, 08 Sep 93 12:41:44 N.)
Status: RO
X-Status: 
X-From-Space-Date: Wed Sep  8 16:40:25 1993
X-From-Space-Address: @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET

Matthew writes, in Shoulsonian tradition of admonitory pedantry:
> la nik. pu cusku zoi neimz.
[...]
> neimz. .i mi te preti di'u zoi gliban.
>
> Have I missed something or are all the above invalid because of the embedded
> "la"s?

Am I right in thinking that "neimz." is not a permissible Lojban
word (not a permissible cmevla) & therefore not a permissible
zoi delimiter?

Yours shoulsonianly,

And.