From @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET  Fri Oct 15 13:02:22 1993
Received: from ELI.CS.YALE.EDU by NEBULA.SYSTEMSZ.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Fri, 15 Oct 1993 07:12:46 -0400
Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by eli.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Fri, 15 Oct 1993 07:12:42 -0400
Message-Id: <199310151112.AA01381@eli.CS.YALE.EDU>
Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)    with BSMTP id 3083; Fri, 15 Oct 93 07:10:47 EDT
Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with  BSMTP id 7578; Fri, 15 Oct 93 07:13:29 EDT
Date:         Fri, 15 Oct 1993 12:02:22 +0100
Reply-To: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU>
From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
Subject:      Re: TEXT: nu la nunmorsi catlu
To: Erik Rauch <rauch>
Status: RO
X-Status: 

A very nice piece. I think it could have done with
a few attitudinals.

I like 'vau' to terminate a relative clause - I wondered at first, but
put it through the parser.

Has 'zasni' changed its meaning? I cannot make it make sense as you
have used it.
>      .i le nolraitru cu zasni le ri xirma poi sutrai vau le pudykurji
I would have used 'te jbera'

        Colin