From @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET  Fri Oct 29 09:00:15 1993
Received: from ELI.CS.YALE.EDU by NEBULA.SYSTEMSZ.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 1993 05:02:12 -0400
Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by eli.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 1993 05:02:08 -0400
Message-Id: <199310290902.AA23474@eli.CS.YALE.EDU>
Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)    with BSMTP id 9475; Fri, 29 Oct 93 05:00:00 EDT
Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with  BSMTP id 3486; Fri, 29 Oct 93 05:03:00 EDT
Date:         Fri, 29 Oct 1993 09:00:15 GMT
Reply-To: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU>
From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
Subject:      Re: TECH: panra/simsa
To: Erik Rauch <rauch>
Status: RO
X-Status: 

I like Bob Chassell's suggestion for 'panra'.

I think I like Lojbab's idea for 'only', but need to see
it in use a bit before I'm sure. (I never understood
po'o)

One note on RJC's examples:
++++>
  lo flalu be fi la frikos e la bemros e la ketcos cu panra
    lo nu valsi vau lo li'i smuni
    The laws of Africa and North and South America are
    similar in the event of words,
    differing in the experience of meaning/interpretation.
>++++
'e' is certainly the wrong connective - the sentence is
asserting of each of the three sets of laws independently
that it is parallel (to itself!)
I'm also uncertain about the choice of abstractors, but that
is not clearcut.

        Colin