From @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET  Fri Oct 29 04:51:49 1993
Received: from ELI.CS.YALE.EDU by NEBULA.SYSTEMSZ.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 1993 08:53:29 -0400
Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by eli.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Fri, 29 Oct 1993 08:53:25 -0400
Message-Id: <199310291253.AA02532@eli.CS.YALE.EDU>
Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)    with BSMTP id 9867; Fri, 29 Oct 93 08:51:17 EDT
Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with  BSMTP id 4440; Fri, 29 Oct 93 08:54:11 EDT
Date:         Fri, 29 Oct 1993 08:51:49 -0400
Reply-To: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU>
From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Subject:      Re: {cikre} as fat gismu
X-To:         bob@grackle.stockbridge.ma.us
X-Cc:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To: Erik Rauch <rauch>
Status: RO
X-Status: 

At any rate, the intent of cikre is that when something complex is broken,
you may choose to fix onlyu one function, or to enable it for only a limited
use.  I know that when I take my car to the shop, there are numerous things
that are chronically wrong with it, but only some of them are fixed.

I have a weaker argument for x4, which on further thought is probably always
going to be embedded in x3.  But I'm not sure of this.

lojbab