From @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET  Tue Oct 12 13:07:03 1993
Received: from ELI.CS.YALE.EDU by NEBULA.SYSTEMSZ.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Tue, 12 Oct 1993 13:07:03 -0400
Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by eli.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Tue, 12 Oct 1993 13:06:56 -0400
Message-Id: <199310121706.AA02067@eli.CS.YALE.EDU>
Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)    with BSMTP id 0322; Tue, 12 Oct 93 13:05:01 EDT
Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with  BSMTP id 8074; Tue, 12 Oct 93 13:07:34 EDT
Date:         Tue, 12 Oct 1993 18:06:07 BST
Reply-To: I.Alexander.bra0125@oasis.icl.co.uk
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU>
From: Iain Alexander <I.Alexander.bra0125@OASIS.ICL.CO.UK>
Subject:      Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
To:         lojbab@access.digex.net
Cc:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
Status: RO
X-Status: 

la djan. kau,n. cusku di'e
> They are compatible if you accept that the {nu klama} isn't necessarily
> coterminous with the {nu cliva}.  You might be said to have ceased leaving
> before you have arrived at your (implied by "klama") destination.
> There can be no firm answer to such a question: it is a variant of the
> "heap" paradox.

Pardon my ignorance, but what on earth is the "heap" paradox?

mi'e .i,n.