From @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET  Tue Oct 12 11:55:26 1993
Received: from ELI.CS.YALE.EDU by NEBULA.SYSTEMSZ.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Tue, 12 Oct 1993 15:56:52 -0400
Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by eli.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Tue, 12 Oct 1993 15:56:31 -0400
Message-Id: <199310121956.AA24363@eli.CS.YALE.EDU>
Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)    with BSMTP id 1164; Tue, 12 Oct 93 15:54:36 EDT
Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with  BSMTP id 9808; Tue, 12 Oct 93 15:57:20 EDT
Date:         Tue, 12 Oct 1993 15:55:26 EDT
Reply-To: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU>
From: Jorge LLambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
Status: RO
X-Status: 

la djan cusku di'e

> >         a gravitationally stable aggregate of items such that
> >         there is no 2 available dimensional view that permits
> >         precise counting of the constituent items.
>
> (I presume this means "available 2-dimensional view".)

> Sorry, this definition is no more precise than the intuitive meaning.
> Consider the notion of being able to count N objects precisely just by
> looking at them.

That's not how I read the definition. Taking a picture of the alleged heap
and taking your time to count is allowed. I know that "heap" is a fuzzy
notion, but the definition is ingenious.

co'o mi'e xorxes