Received: from ELI.CS.YALE.EDU by NEBULA.SYSTEMSZ.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 1993 07:01:34 -0400
Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by eli.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 1993 07:01:29 -0400
Message-Id: <199310131101.AA01728@eli.CS.YALE.EDU>
Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)    with BSMTP id 3637; Wed, 13 Oct 93 06:59:36 EDT
Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with  BSMTP id 4807; Wed, 13 Oct 93 07:02:28 EDT
Date:         Wed, 13 Oct 1993 06:59:50 -0400
Reply-To: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU>
From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Subject:      Re: TECH: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu
X-To:         I.Alexander.bra0125@oasis.icl.co.uk
X-Cc:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To: Erik Rauch <rauch>
Status: RO
X-Status: 
X-From-Space-Date: Wed Oct 13 02:59:50 1993
X-From-Space-Address: @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET

Nora gave a brief response to what I described of your message.  She thinks
that lujvo of the form of bangycusku (or other example you may select) are
covered by the "be" convention, such that the places, which you are "adding"
by introducing the term, are in effect "be BAI" (or in some cases "be fi'o
brivla") forms.  She agress that this application of the convention needs
to be covered in Nick's paper and she thinks it isn;t, but it is not
necessarily a new kind of lujvo, conventionally-speaking.

I, Lojbab, have no  opinion, since I have yet to read Nick's paper %^)

lojbab