Received: from ELI.CS.YALE.EDU by NEBULA.SYSTEMSZ.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 1993 01:37:25 -0400 Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by eli.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 1993 01:37:20 -0400 Message-Id: <199310260537.AA12962@eli.CS.YALE.EDU> Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 3467; Tue, 26 Oct 93 01:35:14 EDT Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 1106; Tue, 26 Oct 93 01:38:18 EDT Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1993 15:35:36 +1000 Reply-To: Nick Nicholas Sender: Lojban list From: Nick Nicholas Subject: Re: TECH: lujvo : tutuear X-To: lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET X-Cc: Lojban Mailing List To: Erik Rauch In-Reply-To: <199310241350.AA12040@mullian.ee.mu.OZ.AU> from "Logical Language Group" at Oct 24, 93 09:48:07 am Status: RO X-Status: X-From-Space-Date: Wed Oct 27 01:35:36 1993 X-From-Space-Address: @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET To Logical Language Group respond I thus: #Mark opined and Jorge agreed that "tutear" did not need a lujvo. I will #agree that it does not need a SHORT lujvo. However, it is a concept #that is not limited to one language, or even a family of languages - the #habit of addressing some individuals with a formal pronoun #We need a good lujvo for 'address' (i.e. vocatively talking to some #one). If we have this lujvo, then (if we could rely on the English #description of what is going on) slabydon-[address] vs #clitydon-[address] would be satisfactory Well, let's see. donvla = word for 'you' donvlapli = use word for 'you' in the context of talking to... so: zoify. tu fy. donvla fy. .i mi donvlapli zoify tu fy lenu tavla do .i mi ta'apli zoify. tu fy. do (.i mi pilno zoify. tu fy. lenu mi tavla do) Without reference to addressing someone *as* something, I doubt there's much difference between addressing and {tavla}. {donta'a}, at the most, to indicate that talk is focussed somehow on the addressee. An alternative is something like {tercmeta'a}: I both talk with someone, and name them. That would force us to gate away with considering tu/vous as names, although in many contexts, you do use titles to address (Japanese routinely uses names rather than personal pronouns in the right honorific circumstances.) Come to think of it, ta'artercme is better, because it gives a better place structure: t1=c3 t2=c2 c1 t3 t4: speaker x1 addresses interlocutor x2 as x3, while talking about x4 in language x5. Hey, that's not bad. %%% %%% %%% %%% %%% %%% %%% %%% %%% %%% %%% %%% %%% non me tenent vincula, non me tenet clavis, % (nsn@mullian.ee.mu.oz.au) quaero mei similes et adjungor pravis. % Nick Nicholas, CogSci victim, --- Archipoeta, _Confessio_. % Univ. of Melbourne, Australia