Received: from ELI.CS.YALE.EDU by NEBULA.SYSTEMSZ.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Tue, 12 Oct 1993 16:12:57 -0400 Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by eli.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Tue, 12 Oct 1993 16:12:18 -0400 Message-Id: <199310122012.AA24747@eli.CS.YALE.EDU> Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 1250; Tue, 12 Oct 93 16:10:26 EDT Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 9977; Tue, 12 Oct 93 16:12:06 EDT Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1993 21:07:48 +0100 Reply-To: ucleaar Sender: Lojban list From: ucleaar Subject: Re: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu X-To: lojban@cuvma.BITNET To: Erik Rauch In-Reply-To: (Your message of Tue, 12 Oct 93 10:26:36 D.) Status: RO X-Status: X-From-Space-Date: Tue Oct 12 22:07:48 1993 X-From-Space-Address: @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET Mark says: > There's > some kind of gut feeling that I can't quite quantify... When I think "A > bird flies through the sky", that has to be "litru" (or maybe "voirli'u"), > even though the bird obviously came from somewhere and will eventually > stop. But the action under consideration is *not* the going anywhere or > leaving anywhere, it's just the *travel* part. This is one case where _litru_ is natural, but _klama_ is not inappropriate, especially if _caho klama_ is used. ---- And KO JBOBANPEHO