Return-Path: Received: from kejal-9101.pc by xiron with uucp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #14) id m0ok5CO-0000osC; Tue, 5 Oct 93 07:44 EET Received: from kruuna.helsinki.fi by xiron with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #14) id m0ok4iz-0000osC; Tue, 5 Oct 93 07:14 EET Received: from charon2-gw.pc.Helsinki.FI by kruuna.helsinki.fi with SMTP id AA01965 (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4 for ); Tue, 5 Oct 1993 07:20:49 +0200 Received: From HYLKN1/WORKQUEUE2 by charon2-gw.pc.Helsinki.FI via Charon 3.4 with IPX id 100.931005071953.448; 05 Oct 93 07:20:45 +0200 Message-Id: Received: From FINHUTC.hut.fi by charon2-gw.pc.Helsinki.FI via Charon 3.4 with SMTP id 102.931005071934.416; 05 Oct 93 07:19:58 +-02-01 Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP R1.2.2MX) with BSMTP id 3286; Tue, 05 Oct 93 07:20:21 EET Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 3284; Tue, 5 Oct 1993 07:20:17 +0200 Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 4436; Tue, 5 Oct 1993 06:19:43 +0100 Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1993 01:16:48 -0400 Reply-To: Logical Language Group Sender: vilva From: Logical Language Group Subject: Re: local units, species hierarchy X-Cc: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Veijo Vilva Content-Length: 1748 Lines: 30 1. I do not think unit-name lujvo need to be "compelling" - they can be among the most awful lujvo we come up with, because there is little likelihood for later confusion over meaning. I like elegant metaphor when I find it, but don't find it vital kurfyradno would probably do, since one reason for the continued use of degrees over radians is that it allows integral measurement of right angles (and other commonly used angles). But whatever we come up with, if we have an explanation, should be fine, since there will be very few lujvo based on radno. 2. Similarly, the fact that "se jutsi", "te jutsi" etc. is vague without the other members of the hierarchy doesn't mean that lujvo based on those are vague. We just have to get a complete list of bilogical divisions and devise SOME lujvo for each. The lujvo for "is in phylum" doesn't need the places for the other subdivisions under phylum either - a case of logical place deletion that cannot be predicted by algorithm, it seems to me. 3. I have extreme disinterest in the pronunication of Linnean names. We have defined the convention that we are quoting non-Lojban text, and thus the way to pronounce them is not part of the LOJBAN language. If we decide to adopt JCBs or some other scheme later (if anyone cares), that is fine. The more significant equivalent problem is that of devising a conventional way of Lojbanizing Linnean names into fu'ivla when this is appropriate. This is a much trickier problem than pronouncing the names in their raw non-Lojbanic form, since it requires both a pronunciation assumption AND rules for modifying that pronunciation to fit the morphology constraints. 4. Unless there is argument, i will make the x3 x4 switch in local units. lojbab