Return-Path: Received: from kejal-9101.pc by xiron with uucp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #14) id m0onVjb-0000osC; Thu, 14 Oct 93 18:41 EET Received: from kruuna.helsinki.fi by xiron with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #14) id m0onUwx-0000osC; Thu, 14 Oct 93 17:50 EET Received: from charon2-gw.pc.Helsinki.FI by kruuna.helsinki.fi with SMTP id AA19488 (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4 for ); Thu, 14 Oct 1993 17:49:41 +0200 Received: From HYLKN1/WORKQUEUE2 by charon2-gw.pc.Helsinki.FI via Charon 3.4 with IPX id 100.931014164907.480; 14 Oct 93 16:49:46 +0200 Message-Id: Received: From FINHUTC.hut.fi by charon2-gw.pc.Helsinki.FI via Charon 3.4 with SMTP id 102.931014164845.448; 14 Oct 93 16:48:50 +-02-01 Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP R1.2.2MX) with BSMTP id 9823; Thu, 14 Oct 93 17:48:56 EET Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 9819; Thu, 14 Oct 1993 17:48:49 +0200 Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 7032; Thu, 14 Oct 1993 16:48:07 +0100 Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1993 08:47:09 -0700 Reply-To: jimc@MATH.UCLA.EDU Sender: vilva From: jimc@MATH.UCLA.EDU Subject: Re: TECH: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu X-To: lojban@cuvmb.columbia.edu To: Veijo Vilva In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 13 Oct 93 21:16:55 EDT." <9310140121.AA03911@julia.math.ucla.edu> Content-Length: 1871 Lines: 44 Lojbab: > > If my concept is one of irrelevancy, > > I have used "cau". There is indeed a second interpretation, as you have > > pointed out, but that may not be what I intended. xorxes: > It still seems to me that {claxu} can't mean "irrelevant". And I can't > read it as making some metacomment on the lujvo, as "take this gismu > without its x5 place". The "without" has to refer to whatever sumti fills > the place, not to the place itself within the place structure. caucarce x1 is a cart for carrying x2 (propulsion place being omitted) xircaucarce x1 is a horseless carriage for carrying x2 (the horse it is without being of breed x3 :-) carce -- x1 is a cart for carrying x2 propelled by x3 xirma xir x1 is a horse of breed x2 claxu cau x1 is lacking x2 It makes me nervous that such similar lujvo would appear solidly on different sides of the place omission question. This result suggests to me that the distinction is bogus. Hence I am inclined to deny the possibility of "omitting" a place -- e.g. every cart has to be capable of being propelled by something, even though in most instances of usage speakers take the default zo'e for the propulsion. However, the place-omitters have a good point: why should speakers be forced to deal with that extra place all the time? I agree, but I say that the gismu is too fat; x3 should be omitted entirely. Thus: lo rulrcarce be gau lo catke A push-flower-cart By the way, it is pure mental telepathy that x3 is filled by cau or xircau. The standard Nick-oid jvajvo interpretation I believe would be: caucarce x1 is a cart propelled by x2 (omitting cargo) (example: gasbuggy, pushcart) xircaucarce x1 is a cart propelled by x2 which lacks any accomodation for carrying horses -- jimc