Received: from ELI.CS.YALE.EDU by NEBULA.SYSTEMSZ.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Thu, 14 Oct 1993 10:33:12 -0400 Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by eli.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Thu, 14 Oct 1993 10:33:02 -0400 Message-Id: <199310141433.AA05669@eli.CS.YALE.EDU> Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 9039; Thu, 14 Oct 93 10:31:07 EDT Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 6506; Thu, 14 Oct 93 08:32:23 EDT Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1993 13:31:22 BST Reply-To: I.Alexander.bra0125@oasis.icl.co.uk Sender: Lojban list From: Iain Alexander Subject: Re: TECH: Lean Lujvo and fat gismu X-To: lojbab@access.digex.net X-Cc: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Erik Rauch Status: RO X-Status: X-From-Space-Date: Thu Oct 14 10:33:12 1993 X-From-Space-Address: @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET la lojbab. cusku di'e > Nora gave a brief response to what I described of your message. She thinks > that lujvo of the form of bangycusku (or other example you may select) are > covered by the "be" convention, such that the places, which you are "adding" > by introducing the term, are in effect "be BAI" (or in some cases "be fi'o > brivla") forms. She agress that this application of the convention needs > to be covered in Nick's paper and she thinks it isn;t, but it is not > necessarily a new kind of lujvo, conventionally-speaking. I'm not sure it's quite as simple as that, since in {bangycusku}, {bangu} is the {broda} in the {be fi'o broda} tag that we're using to add the new sumti, rather than suggesting a sumti introduced by the tag. But then maybe la nitcion. can do some fast talking. %~} mi'e .i,n.