Received: from ELI.CS.YALE.EDU by NEBULA.SYSTEMSZ.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Tue, 5 Oct 1993 01:20:15 -0400 Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by eli.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Tue, 5 Oct 1993 01:20:09 -0400 Message-Id: <199310050520.AA07651@eli.CS.YALE.EDU> Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 4213; Tue, 05 Oct 93 01:18:18 EDT Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 3155; Tue, 05 Oct 93 01:19:05 EDT Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1993 01:16:48 -0400 Reply-To: Logical Language Group Sender: Lojban list From: Logical Language Group Subject: Re: local units, species hierarchy X-Cc: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Erik Rauch Status: RO X-Status: X-From-Space-Date: Mon Oct 4 21:16:48 1993 X-From-Space-Address: @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET 1. I do not think unit-name lujvo need to be "compelling" - they can be among the most awful lujvo we come up with, because there is little likelihood for later confusion over meaning. I like elegant metaphor when I find it, but don't find it vital kurfyradno would probably do, since one reason for the continued use of degrees over radians is that it allows integral measurement of right angles (and other commonly used angles). But whatever we come up with, if we have an explanation, should be fine, since there will be very few lujvo based on radno. 2. Similarly, the fact that "se jutsi", "te jutsi" etc. is vague without the other members of the hierarchy doesn't mean that lujvo based on those are vague. We just have to get a complete list of bilogical divisions and devise SOME lujvo for each. The lujvo for "is in phylum" doesn't need the places for the other subdivisions under phylum either - a case of logical place deletion that cannot be predicted by algorithm, it seems to me. 3. I have extreme disinterest in the pronunication of Linnean names. We have defined the convention that we are quoting non-Lojban text, and thus the way to pronounce them is not part of the LOJBAN language. If we decide to adopt JCBs or some other scheme later (if anyone cares), that is fine. The more significant equivalent problem is that of devising a conventional way of Lojbanizing Linnean names into fu'ivla when this is appropriate. This is a much trickier problem than pronouncing the names in their raw non-Lojbanic form, since it requires both a pronunciation assumption AND rules for modifying that pronunciation to fit the morphology constraints. 4. Unless there is argument, i will make the x3 x4 switch in local units. lojbab