From @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET  Thu Nov 18 12:20:18 1993
Received: from ELI.CS.YALE.EDU by NEBULA.SYSTEMSZ.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Thu, 18 Nov 1993 17:43:54 -0500
Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by eli.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Thu, 18 Nov 1993 17:43:49 -0500
Message-Id: <199311182243.AA00426@eli.CS.YALE.EDU>
Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)    with BSMTP id 0773; Thu, 18 Nov 93 17:43:27 EST
Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with  BSMTP id 8594; Thu, 18 Nov 93 17:41:36 EDT
Date:         Thu, 18 Nov 1993 17:20:18 -0500
Reply-To: David Eric Young <fred@WAM.UMD.EDU>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU>
From: David Eric Young <fred@WAM.UMD.EDU>
Subject:      Re: proposal for new member of SE
To:         ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk
Status: RO
X-Status: 

>...
>Could we not instead have an additional SE (with rafsi) that means:
>  exchange 1st & last places
>Used recursively, this would allow a different way of getting at
>places beyond the 5th.
>For example, if this new member of SE were "xehe", rafsi "xez",
>then the lujvo for "x1 is the vehicle of an event of going"
>would be "xeznunkla".


I like to ask for opinions on another alternative to the example
which does not require the addition of a new member of SE.

What about:

le marce po le nunklama

The Vehicle associated with the event of going.

Thanks in advance,

Dave Young