Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI,@SEARN.SUNET.SE:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #14) id m0ovVqc-0000PNC; Fri, 5 Nov 93 20:25 EET
Message-Id: <m0ovVqc-0000PNC@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP R1.2.2MX) with BSMTP id 8083; Fri, 05 Nov 93 20:25:36 EET
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 8081; Fri, 5 Nov 1993 20:25:35 +0200
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE
 (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 7832; Fri, 5 Nov 1993 19:24:50 +0100
Date:         Fri, 5 Nov 1993 18:06:01 GMT
Reply-To:     Colin Fine <C.J.Fine%BRADFORD.AC.UK@FINHUTC.hut.fi>
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@FINHUTC.hut.fi>
From:         Colin Fine <C.J.Fine%BRADFORD.AC.UK@FINHUTC.hut.fi>
Subject:      re'enai
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 245
Lines: 10

Working through MacLogflash on cmavo, I've just
come across re'enai.

I really am not happy with this as 'sacrilege' -
that is still re'e - probably something like
i'enaire'ele'o

Surely re'enai is something like 'non-spiritual'?

        Colin