Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET> Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #14) id m0p197I-0000PaC; Sun, 21 Nov 93 09:21 EET Message-Id: Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP R1.2.2MX) with BSMTP id 0211; Sun, 21 Nov 93 09:22:08 EET Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 0210; Sun, 21 Nov 1993 09:22:08 +0200 Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 1301; Sun, 21 Nov 1993 08:21:16 +0100 Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1993 02:19:32 -0500 Reply-To: Logical Language Group Sender: Lojban list From: Logical Language Group Subject: Re: proposal for new member of SE X-To: ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk X-cc: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Veijo Vilva Content-Length: 384 Lines: 11 51234 order: fu ko'u fa ko'a ko'e ko'i ko'o broda You only need two FA members. If the first was x6, you would use faxixa instead. Only if you need to put the x6 of nunkla in a description to you need an x6 converter, and I think that is rare enough that sexixa is adequate (or whatever convention for subscripting is decided bythe first person to actually use the phrase). lojbab