Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #14) id m0p09l3-0000PZC; Thu, 18 Nov 93 15:50 EET
Message-Id: <m0p09l3-0000PZC@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP R1.2.2MX) with BSMTP id 7206; Thu, 18 Nov 93 15:51:02 EET
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 7204; Thu, 18 Nov 1993 15:51:01 +0200
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE
 (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 4527; Thu, 18 Nov 1993 14:50:07 +0100
Date:         Thu, 18 Nov 1993 11:02:50 GMT
Reply-To:     Colin Fine <C.J.Fine%BRADFORD.AC.UK@FINHUTC.hut.fi>
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@FINHUTC.hut.fi>
From:         Colin Fine <C.J.Fine%BRADFORD.AC.UK@FINHUTC.hut.fi>
Subject:      Re: proposal for new member of SE
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 483
Lines: 16

> Could we not instead have an additional SE (with rafsi) that means:
>  exchange 1st & last places
>Used recursively, this would allow a different way of getting at
>places beyond the 5th.
>For example, if this new member of SE were "xehe", rafsi "xez",
>then the lujvo for "x1 is the vehicle of an event of going"
>would be "xeznunkla".

.i'enai .oi

This is rampant ad-hocery. I also don't see how it could be
used recursively.

I see nothing wrong with using zei.

        Colin