Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #14) id m0p0I4Z-0000PaC; Fri, 19 Nov 93 00:43 EET
Message-Id: <m0p0I4Z-0000PaC@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP R1.2.2MX) with BSMTP id 2975; Fri, 19 Nov 93 00:43:47 EET
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 2974; Fri, 19 Nov 1993 00:43:47 +0200
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE
 (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 9055; Thu, 18 Nov 1993 23:42:54 +0100
Date:         Thu, 18 Nov 1993 17:20:18 -0500
Reply-To:     David Eric Young <fred%WAM.UMD.EDU@FINHUTC.hut.fi>
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@FINHUTC.hut.fi>
From:         David Eric Young <fred%WAM.UMD.EDU@FINHUTC.hut.fi>
Subject:      Re: proposal for new member of SE
X-To:         ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 588
Lines: 22

>...
>Could we not instead have an additional SE (with rafsi) that means:
>  exchange 1st & last places
>Used recursively, this would allow a different way of getting at
>places beyond the 5th.
>For example, if this new member of SE were "xehe", rafsi "xez",
>then the lujvo for "x1 is the vehicle of an event of going"
>would be "xeznunkla".


I like to ask for opinions on another alternative to the example
which does not require the addition of a new member of SE.

What about:

le marce po le nunklama

The Vehicle associated with the event of going.

Thanks in advance,

Dave Young