Received: from BULLDOG.CS.YALE.EDU by NEBULA.SYSTEMSZ.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Thu, 18 Nov 1993 06:59:40 -0500
Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by bulldog.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Thu, 18 Nov 1993 06:59:37 -0500
Message-Id: <199311181159.AA01253@bulldog.CS.YALE.EDU>
Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)    with BSMTP id 7048; Thu, 18 Nov 93 06:51:43 EST
Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with  BSMTP id 0659; Thu, 18 Nov 93 06:43:15 EDT
Date:         Thu, 18 Nov 1993 11:02:50 GMT
Reply-To: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU>
From: Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>
Subject:      Re: proposal for new member of SE
To: Erik Rauch <rauch>
Status: RO
X-Status: 
X-From-Space-Date: Thu Nov 18 11:02:50 1993
X-From-Space-Address: @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET

> Could we not instead have an additional SE (with rafsi) that means:
>  exchange 1st & last places
>Used recursively, this would allow a different way of getting at
>places beyond the 5th.
>For example, if this new member of SE were "xehe", rafsi "xez",
>then the lujvo for "x1 is the vehicle of an event of going"
>would be "xeznunkla".

.i'enai .oi

This is rampant ad-hocery. I also don't see how it could be
used recursively.

I see nothing wrong with using zei.

        Colin