Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #14) id m0p7py4-0000PYC; Thu, 9 Dec 93 20:20 EET
Message-Id: <m0p7py4-0000PYC@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP R1.2.2MX) with BSMTP id 1503; Thu, 09 Dec 93 20:20:15 EET
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 1502; Thu, 9 Dec 1993 20:20:14 +0200
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE
 (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 2459; Thu, 9 Dec 1993 19:19:16 +0100
Date:         Thu, 9 Dec 1993 17:18:59 GMT
Reply-To:     Colin Fine <C.J.Fine%BRADFORD.AC.UK@FINHUTC.hut.fi>
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@FINHUTC.hut.fi>
From:         Colin Fine <C.J.Fine%BRADFORD.AC.UK@FINHUTC.hut.fi>
Subject:      Re: responses to Jorge on fat gismu
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 462
Lines: 14

Jorge answers John:
+++++++>
> I think it is not an attitude, but rather a "ve cusku"; you may request by
> letter, or by "bacru"-ing, or by gesture.  "Form" is the more important
> concept.

If that is the case, wouldn't a {vecu'u} tag suffice? It doesn't seem to be
crucial to the concept. lojbab seemed to have in mind an attitude, though:
>+++++++

think the manner (ie method, form, not so much attitude) is an essential
part of the concept.

        Colin