Received: from ELI.CS.YALE.EDU by NEBULA.SYSTEMSZ.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Thu, 9 Dec 1993 20:20:45 -0500 Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by eli.CS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Thu, 9 Dec 1993 19:56:19 -0500 Message-Id: <199312100056.AA03951@eli.CS.YALE.EDU> Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 6308; Thu, 09 Dec 93 20:18:36 EST Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 4119; Thu, 09 Dec 93 20:20:17 EDT Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1993 20:22:06 EST Reply-To: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU Sender: Lojban list From: Jorge Llambias Subject: Re: responses to Jorge on fat gismu X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Erik Rauch Status: RO X-Status: X-From-Space-Date: Thu Dec 9 15:22:06 1993 X-From-Space-Address: @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET la kolin mi spuda di'e > If that is the case, wouldn't a {vecu'u} tag suffice? It doesn't seem to be > crucial to the concept. lojbab seemed to have in mind an attitude, though: > >+++++++ > > think the manner (ie method, form, not so much attitude) is an essential > part of the concept. i le crane pagbu be le ky jufra na mo'u se benji fi mi i mi sruma le du'u le go'i du zoi gy I don't gy i ki'u da mi jinvi le du'u mi srera i zo'ocu'i ma mupli fi le'i ve cpedu co'o mi'e xorxes (to ko mi fraxu doi kolin i mi ti do reroi mrilu ri'a le mi ka juxre toi)